Microbes in the Pu•biome Database


Summary

There are over 2651 bacteria and archaea currently in the collection.

All species have been isolated from - or detected in - human faeces, intestinal mucosa or other parts of the GI tract. With a few exceptions, only organisms that have been cultured and characterised to some degree have been included. This is a living document; it will be updated when new information is forthcoming.


There are an estimated 503 commonly encountered gut bacteria.

These organisms are found frequently enough in gut microbiome surveys to qualify, and many were discovered and characterised decades ago. They can be arbitrarily divided into 3 main groups: 87 'widespread' microbes - or those that appear in most surveys from different locations; 141 'moderate' microbes - probably locally dominant geographically, but not as widespread; 275 'minor' colonisers - likely locally important but not as frequent or abundant.

The remaining 2148 reported bacteria are rarer colonisers or probably transient.

The majority of bacteria that have been detected in faecal samples or gut biopsies can be considered as 'rare' colonisers (1446) because they occur infrequently, or as either 'unlikely' colonisers (568) or 'non-colonisers' (134) because they are transient from the upper GI (mouth, stomach, ingested with food), are (strictly) aerobic non-spore formers, are known pathogens, or are not mesophilic.

Microflora not included in the database

Viruses and eukaryotes including fungi, yeasts, protozoa, algae or multicelled parasites are not included in this database. Also, unassigned species (e.g., Clostridium_M sp000431375) and multiple strains of known species are not included (with a few exceptions).


Rationale for Microbiome Membership: Notes, Interpretations and Associated Caveats

Baseline microbiota were established by pioneers in the field, namely Sydney Finegold, Holdeman & Moore, and Yoshimi Benno, almost fifty years ago. In their respective studies, healthy volunteers from Japan, Hawaii and North America provided stool samples from which many bacteria were cultured and characterised at the species level. Since then, over sixty species-level surveys have been published, and the methods for detecting microbes has improved. For the purposes of creating this database, the frequency of gut microbes in the real world is estimated by how often they're detected in microbiome surveys (see Table 2 at the bottom for a list of surveys). Although a number of these studies show biases it is reasonable to assume the large dataset taken as a whole will reduce the impact of any such bias.

An important weighting factor is provided by 'lived experience' resources, such as the company, unseenbio.com, which has data from actual patient screening (see Table 3 for weighted 'exceptions'). This company has public-facing data which shows the preponderance of any given microbe in healthy Europeans. This information has helped adjust the microbiome heirarchy.

The microbes have been placed into six groups, ranging from widespread to transient (non-colonising)(Table 1). A list of each group is available by clicking on the link.

Some provisos to keep in mind: frequency of detection doesn't necessarily correlate with abundance. In addition, keystone species - those that are highly influential on the microbiome composition - may only be relatively sparse. The same applies to temporary microbes; transient organisms can apparently still impact the ecology within the gut and affect the host.

Table 1: The table below summarises the division of the gut microflora. Prevalence thresholds are survey counts.

Colonisation Prevalence Prevalence Thresholds Unique Microbes Notes
Widespread ≥ 23 87 Surveys must be from at least two geographical regions. See also exceptions table.
Moderate 15 - 22 141 Usually very frequent in at least one geographical area. See also exceptions table.
Minor 7-14 275 Can be dominant in a localised population. See also exceptions table.
Rare 0-6 1446 Rarely dominant, usually present in much less than 1% (Plesiomonas shigelloides is an exception). See also exceptions table.
Unlikely Various 568 Temporary colonisers, transient organisms, strict aerobes.
Non-coloniser Various 134 Pathogens, misassigned, transient organisms.

Very common - or 'widespread' - gut bacteria

Many people may be familiar with commonly encountered gut bacteria. These could include: common commensals, such as Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Phocaeicola vulgatus and Ruminococcus bromii; pathogens, such as Vibrio cholerae, Salmonella enterica and Campylobacter jejuni; and bugs that can be both commensal and pathogenic, such as Escherichia coli ("E coli"), Bacteroides fragilis and Clostridioides difficile ("C-diff"). However, an individual might not have any of these bacteria in their microbiome.

It appears as though there is no single bacterium that is part of everyone's (healthy) microbiome makeup. Although a healthy person will harbour between 70->1000 individual species of gut microbes at any given time in their life, only a small handful of microorganisms are common to most people. These organisms are detected in the majority of faecal surveys - whether through culturomics or gene sequencing approaches - and are among the group that has been categorised here as being 'widespread'. There is no "one set" of bacteria that suits everyone because of functional redundancy (Schluter2012, Costello2009). In other words, there are bacteria occupying the same ecological niche that can do the same job within the microbiome.

Caveats: A lot of the most recognisable bacteria from the human gut were discovered 50-odd years ago (or more). But are they widespread because they're truly common, or are they just easier to isolate and culture? There has also traditionally been an emphasis on characterising pathogenic organisms, many of which are facultative anaerobes and are mostly straightforward to isolate and identify. Likewise, some common colonic bacteria are opportunistic pathogens. Organisms of clinical significance have been subject to a lot of attention and tend to be well characterised. This could be a source of detection bias because S16 rRNA probes were likely established for these first.

Another anomaly is one of underrepresentation of some bacteria due to technical issues. For example, a very common bacterial strain might be a species-in-waiting, i.e., the strain might meet the criteria required to define it as a species, but is yet to be isolated, characterised and named (these parts are time consuming). Or the recurring detection of a genetic sequence may be insufficient to identify it to the species level. Neither of these types of microbes are included in the current database but will be a source of data bias.

As mentioned above, some organisms might be hard to detect because the generic S16 rRNA probes used to amplify bacterial genes may not be suitable. This can lead to underrepresentation in surveys.


Locally dominant gut bacteria

Moderately common gut microbes ('moderate') might be considered to be dominant but spatially restricted. That is, they could be important within one human population as a result of similarities in diet (e.g., Chinese vs Mediterranean diets), family (genetics and/or proximity) or because of the local environment, but be scarce or absent in another survey from a different location.

Caveats: Not all populations are represented, and those that are do not have the same level of coverage. Studies from Africa are scarce, for example. Researchers, such as Drancourt, Lagier, Raoult, and Fournier, and coworkers, have endeavoured to explore this rich source of novel bacteria, but much still needs to be done to understand the diversity of localised microbiota there. The caveats described previously apply here also.


Common, but less dominant, gut bacteria

The term 'minor' has been used here to describe microbes that show up occasionally, around 10-15% of the time. This could include microbes that are endemic to a particular population or might be associated with a localised (and transient) outbreak of a pathogenic nature.

Some semi-transient species considered to be good for gut health also might be included here. Lactobacillus bacteria are a diverse group in terms of their spatial and temporal colonising behaviours. Latilactobacillus sakei, for example, is detected in faeces in about 10 studies but appears to be sparce and temporary in its ability to colonise (Rossi2016). Levilactobacillus brevis and Lactiplantibacillus pentosus appear to act the same way (Rossi2016).

Caveats: Gut microbiome persistence - and even abundance - might not necessarily correlate with a microbe's level of influence. An organism can be highly influential in a number of ways, including being an essential part of a metabolic bacterial consortium (e.g., initiating the cleavage of mucin), by suppressing (or aggravating) immune responses, or by helping to exclude pathogenic species. Further to this point, mucus-associated bacteria are often present in higher amounts closer to the epithelium than in the lumen. Surveys concentrating exclusively on faeces might underestimate these localised microflora.


Uncommon gut bacteria

Simply put, uncommon - or 'rare' - species are those that show up in only a few (or no) studies. The cut-off here is ≤ 5 studies. This tends to be a default for newly characterised organisms, at least until additional information allows them to be placed in a more suitable category.

Caveats: Aside from the previous provisos, another factor to consider is that the detection of a microbe in any given study may occur only once, i.e., it is part of a single subject's microbiome. Perhaps that person ate food contaminated with an organism that subsequently made its way through the travails of the digestive system and was picked up in the screen. In an ideal world it would be useful to aggregate all the subject data and base species abundance on the whole dataset, but not all sources report at the individual level.

Conversely, an important microbe might fly under the radar because a species has been split among subspecies or strains. To illustrate this point, a recent faecal analysis of a subject returned several designations for the keystone species, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, including F. prausnitzii_A, _B and _C. The abundance of individual strains with respect to the total was less than 2.5% but the combined abundance amounted to about 6% - quite a difference. A second sample from the same person a year later showed the presence of types _A, _C, _D, _G, _I and _J, where no individual strain represented more than 2%, but the aggregate was 5.2%. Clearly, as time passes and our collective knowledge increases, existing species will undergo further splitting based on genotyping. Currently, the database only accounts for the sum of the phenotypic strains at the species and subspecies level, not the strain level. This is recognised as a potential issue since species strains can differ critically and selective processes may favour one strain over another, depending a person's individual physiology and established microbiome.

A final point here: recently isolated, characterised and named species will suffer from underrepresentation in preceding surveys, even though they might have been present in the form of an alias (e.g., Bacteroides xylanisolvens vs its synonym, 'Bacteroides sp 2 1 16'). All efforts have been made to capture synonyms and use current taxonomic naming conventions, however assigning lab-designated strains (e.g., 'Blautia_A sp000285855') to actual published species is currently beyond the scope of this project.


Unlikely (to colonise) bacteria

The category designated as 'unlikely coloniser' will be rather controversial. Here, species may be detected in several studies but are unlikely to play a significant role in a healthy gut microbe (apart from the temporary affects of pathogens, of course). To fit into this category, an organism might have an optimal growth temperature, salt requirement or pH outside the range of body, which would likely hamper its persistence in a competitive environment. Similarly, strict aerobes cannot grow under anaerobic conditions and although some aerobic bacteria inhabit the caecum and upper GI tract, they generally cannot persist for long in the gut.

Finally, pathogens known to cause illness (e.g., Salmonella enterica strains, Yersinia pestis) are considered unlikely colonisers simply because they generally don't belong in a healthy microbiome.

Caveats: There are exceptions to the rule, especially when it comes to aerobic bacteria. Bacillus massiliogabonensis is a strictly aerobic commensal that has been cultured from fresh stool samples. Other Bacillus and Lactobacillus species might influence host immune responses and metabolism as part of a secretome microbial consortium (Ilinskaya2017), where transient microbes play a functional role by releasing metabolites, enzymes or bacteriocides as they journey through the GIT.


Transient bacteria

When an RNA sequence has been attributed to an organism that is very unlikely to be associated with humans, the bug is deposited in the category 'non-coloniser'. Interesting cases include Alkaliphilus transvaalensis, a highly alkaliphilic species growing deep underground, or Desulforudis audaxviator, an organism so strange it reproduces (at most) once a year!

Since this database ostensibly covers only the intestinal tract a stomach resident, such as Helicobacter pylori, would not be considered an intestinal coloniser despite being picked up in 8 studies. It would also be labelled as a non-coloniser.

Caveats: Being an extremophile doesn't necessary preclude a species from having strains that can survive in the GIT. Archaea, including some recently discovered haloarchaea (Kim2020b) in Korean subjects, have been found to be prevalent in humans. As a consequence, it would be presumptuous to exclude all seemly wierd microbes in the absence of additional information. It has therefore been decided to keep them until it becomes clear they don't belong.


Gut Bacteria Source Material

Most database entries are derived from published surveys and studies (see the sortable table below). In addition, Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, the Culture Collection University of Gothenburg and individual papers available online account for a significant number as well.

Groups of pathogenic bacteria might have been detected in clinical sources associated with the gastrointestinal tract; this presumes the organism at least temporarily resides in the gut and is therefore included, but doesn't assume it is a member of the usual gut microbiome.

Table 2: Citation table for the surveys used in this project. The table is sortable by clicking on the headings.

Citation Year Authors Title DOI/PMID
Benno1989 1989

Benno, Y.; Endo, K.; Mizutani, T.; Namba, Y.; Komori, T.; Mitsuoka, T.

Comparison of fecal microflora of elderly persons in rural and urban areas of Japan. 10.1128/aem.55.5.1100-1105.1989
Browne2016 2016

Browne, Hilary P.; Forster, Samuel C.; Anonye, Blessing O.; Kumar, Nitin; Neville, B. Anne; Stares, Mark D.; Goulding, David; Lawley, Trevor D.

Culturing of 'unculturable' human microbiota reveals novel taxa and extensive sporulation. 10.1038/nature17645
Diamanti2020 2020

Diamanti, Andrea Picchianti; Panebianco, Concetta; Salerno, Gerardo; Rosa, Roberta Di; Salemi, Simonetta; Sorgi, Maria Laura; Meneguzzi, Giorgia; Mariani, Maria Benedetta; Rai, Alessandra; Iacono, Dalila; Sesti, Giorgio; Pazienza, Valerio; Lagana, Bruno

Impact of Mediterranean Diet on Disease Activity and Gut Microbiota Composition of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. 10.3390/microorganisms8121989
Lagier2012b 2012

Lagier, J.-C.; Armougom, F.; Million, M.; Hugon, P.; Pagnier, I.; Robert, C.; Bittar, F.; Fournous, G.; Gimenez, G.; Maraninchi, M.; Trape, J.-F.; Koonin, E. V.; Scola, B. La; Raoult, D.

Microbial culturomics: paradigm shift in the human gut microbiome study. 10.1111/1469-0691.12023
Pfleiderer2013 2013

Pfleiderer, A.; Lagier, J.-C.; Armougom, F.; Robert, C.; Vialettes, B.; Raoult, D.

Culturomics identified 11 new bacterial species from a single anorexia nervosa stool sample. 10.1007/s10096-013-1900-2
RajilicStojanovic2014 2014

Rajili-Stojanovi M, de Vos WM.

The first 1000 cultured species of the human gastrointestinal microbiota. 10.1111/1574-6976.12075
Walker2011 2011

Walker AW, Sanderson JD, Churcher C, Parkes GC, Hudspith BN, Rayment N, Brostoff J, Parkhill J, Dougan G, Petrovska L.

High-throughput clone library analysis of the mucosa-associated microbiota reveals dysbiosis and differences between inflamed and non-inflamed regions of the intestine in inflammatory bowel disease. 10.1186/1471-2180-11-7
Hoyles2012 2012

Hoyles L, Honda H, Logan NA, Halket G, La Ragione RM, McCartney AL.

Recognition of greater diversity of Bacillus species and related bacteria in human faeces. 10.1016/j.resmic.2011.10.004
Chung2019 2019

Wing Sun Faith Chung, Alan W Walker, Joan Vermeiren, Paul O Sheridan, Douwina Bosscher, Vicenta Garcia-Campayo, Julian Parkhill, Harry J Flint, Sylvia H Duncan

Impact of carbohydrate substrate complexity on the diversity of the human colonic microbiota. 10.1093/femsec/fiy201
King2019 2019

King CH, Desai H, Sylvetsky AC, LoTempio J, Ayanyan S, Carrie J, Crandall KA, Fochtman BC, Gasparyan L, Gulzar N, Howell P, Issa N, Krampis K, Mishra L, Morizono H, Pisegna JR, Rao S, Ren Y, Simonyan V, Smith K, VedBrat S, Yao MD, Mazumder R.

Baseline human gut microbiota profile in healthy people and standard reporting template. 10.1371/journal.pone.0206484
Moore1974 1974

Moore WE, Holdeman LV.

Human fecal flora: the normal flora of 20 Japanese-Hawaiians. 10.1128/am.27.5.961-979.1974
Chung2016 2016

Chung WS, Walker AW, Louis P, Parkhill J, Vermeiren J, Bosscher D, Duncan SH, Flint HJ.

Modulation of the human gut microbiota by dietary fibres occurs at the species level. 10.1186/s12915-015-0224-3
Salonen2014 2014

Salonen A, Lahti L, Salojärvi J, Holtrop G, Korpela K, Duncan SH, Date P, Farquharson F, Johnstone AM, Lobley GE, Louis P, Flint HJ, de Vos WM.

Impact of diet and individual variation on intestinal microbiota composition and fermentation products in obese men. 10.1038/ismej.2014.63
Finegold1974 1974

Sydney M. Finegold, Howard R. Attebery and Vera L. Sutter

Effect of diet on human fecal flora: comparison of Japanese and American diets 10.1093/ajcn/27.12.1456
Aujoulat2014 2014

Aujoulat F, Roudière L, Picaud JC, Jacquot A, Filleron A, Neveu D, Baum TP, Marchandin H, Jumas-Bilak E.

Temporal dynamics of the very premature infant gut dominant microbiota. 10.1186/s12866-014-0325-0
De2020 2020

De R, Mukhopadhyay AK, Dutta S.

Metagenomic analysis of gut microbiome and resistome of diarrheal fecal samples from Kolkata, India, reveals the core and variable microbiota including signatures of microbial dark matter. 10.1186/s13099-020-00371-8
Yang2020 2020

Yang J, Pu J, Lu S, Bai X, Wu Y, Jin D, Cheng Y, Zhang G, Zhu W, Luo X, Rosselló-Móra R, Xu J.

Species-Level Analysis of Human Gut Microbiota With Metataxonomics. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.02029
Lagier2016 2016

Lagier JC, Khelaifia S, Alou MT, Ndongo S, Dione N, Hugon P, Caputo A, Cadoret F, Traore SI, Seck EH, Dubourg G, Durand G, Mourembou G, Guilhot E, Togo A, Bellali S, Bachar D, Cassir N, Bittar F, Delerce J, Mailhe M, Ricaboni D, Bilen M, Dangui Nieko NP, Dia Badiane NM, Valles C, Mouelhi D, Diop K, Million M, Musso D, Abrahão J, Azhar EI, Bibi F, Yasir M, Diallo A, Sokhna C, Djossou F, Vitton V, Robert C, Rolain JM, La Scola B, Fournier PE, Levasseur A, Raoult D.

Culture of previously uncultured members of the human gut microbiota by culturomics. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.203
McLaughlin2010 2010

McLaughlin SD, Walker AW, Churcher C, Clark SK, Tekkis PP, Johnson MW, Parkhill J, Ciclitira PJ, Dougan G, Nicholls RJ, Petrovska L.

The bacteriology of pouchitis: a molecular phylogenetic analysis using 16S rRNA gene cloning and sequencing. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e3dc8b
Forster2019 2019

Forster SC, Kumar N, Anonye BO, Almeida A, Viciani E, Stares MD, Dunn M, Mkandawire TT, Zhu A, Shao Y, Pike LJ, Louie T, Browne HP, Mitchell AL, Neville BA, Finn RD, Lawley TD.

A human gut bacterial genome and culture collection for improved metagenomic analyses. 10.1038/s41587-018-0009-7.
Almeida2019 2019

Almeida A, Mitchell AL, Boland M, Forster SC, Gloor GB, Tarkowska A, Lawley TD, Finn RD.

A new genomic blueprint of the human gut microbiota. 10.1038/s41586-019-0965-1
Zou2019 2019

Zou Y, Xue W, Luo G, Deng Z, Qin P, Guo R, Sun H, Xia Y, Liang S, Dai Y, Wan D, Jiang R, Su L, Feng Q, Jie Z, Guo T, Xia Z, Liu C, Yu J, Lin Y, Tang S, Huo G, Xu X, Hou Y, Liu X, Wang J, Yang H, Kristiansen K, Li J, Jia H, Xiao L.

1,520 reference genomes from cultivated human gut bacteria enable functional microbiome analyses. 10.1038/s41587-018-0008-8
Nielsen2014 2014

Nielsen HB, Almeida M, Juncker AS, Rasmussen S, Li J, Sunagawa S, Plichta DR, Gautier L, Pedersen AG, Le Chatelier E, Pelletier E, Bonde I, Nielsen T, Manichanh C, Arumugam M, Batto JM, Quintanilha Dos Santos MB, Blom N, Borruel N, Burgdorf KS, Boumezbeur F, Casellas F, Doré J, Dworzynski P, Guarner F, Hansen T, Hildebrand F, Kaas RS, Kennedy S, Kristiansen K, Kultima JR, Léonard P, Levenez F, Lund O, Moumen B, Le Paslier D, Pons N, Pedersen O, Prifti E, Qin J, Raes J, Sørensen S, Tap J, Tims S, Ussery DW, Yamada T; MetaHIT Consortium, Renault P, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Bork P, Wang J, Brunak S, Ehrlich SD;

MetaHIT Consortium. Identification and assembly of genomes and genetic elements in complex metagenomic samples without using reference genomes. 10.1038/nbt.2939
Tyakht2013 2013

Tyakht AV, Kostryukova ES, Popenko AS, Belenikin MS, Pavlenko AV, Larin AK, Karpova IY, Selezneva OV, Semashko TA, Ospanova EA, Babenko VV, Maev IV, Cheremushkin SV, Kucheryavyy YA, Shcherbakov PL, Grinevich VB, Efimov OI, Sas EI, Abdulkhakov RA, Abdulkhakov SR, Lyalyukova EA, Livzan MA, Vlassov VV, Sagdeev RZ, Tsukanov VV, Osipenko MF, Kozlova IV, Tkachev AV, Sergienko VI, Alexeev DG, Govorun VM.

Human gut microbiota community structures in urban and rural populations in Russia. 10.1038/ncomms3469
Rothschild2018 2018

Rothschild D, Weissbrod O, Barkan E, Kurilshikov A, Korem T, Zeevi D, Costea PI, Godneva A, Kalka IN, Bar N, Shilo S, Lador D, Vila AV, Zmora N, Pevsner-Fischer M, Israeli D, Kosower N, Malka G, Wolf BC, Avnit-Sagi T, Lotan-Pompan M, Weinberger A, Halpern Z, Carmi S, Fu J, Wijmenga C, Zhernakova A, Elinav E, Segal E.

Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota. 10.1038/nature25973
Benno1986 1986

Benno Y, Suzuki K, Suzuki K, Narisawa K, Bruce WR, Mitsuoka T.

Comparison of the fecal microflora in rural Japanese and urban Canadians. 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1986.tb02978.x
Taylor1985 1985

Taylor GR, Kropp KD, Molina TC.

Nine-year microflora study of an isolator-maintained immunodeficient child. 10.1128/aem.50.6.1349-1356.1985
Pandey2012 2012

Pandey PK, Verma P, Kumar H, Bavdekar A, Patole MS, Shouche YS.

Comparative analysis of fecal microflora of healthy full-term Indian infants born with different methods of delivery (vaginal vs cesarean): Acinetobacter sp. prevalence in vaginally born infants. 10.1007/s12038-012-9268-5
Wang2005 2005

Wang M, Ahrné S, Jeppsson B, Molin G.

Comparison of bacterial diversity along the human intestinal tract by direct cloning and sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. 10.1016/j.femsec.2005.03.012
PerisBondia2011 2011

Peris-Bondia F, Latorre A, Artacho A, Moya A, D'Auria G.

The active human gut microbiota differs from the total microbiota. 10.1371/journal.pone.0022448
Finegold1977 1977

Finegold SM, Sutter VL, Sugihara PT, Elder HA, Lehmann SM, Phillips RL.

Fecal microbial flora in Seventh Day Adventist populations and control subjects. 10.1093/ajcn/30.11.1781
Favier2002 2002

Favier CF, Vaughan EE, De Vos WM, Akkermans AD.

Molecular monitoring of succession of bacterial communities in human neonates. 10.1128/AEM.68.1.219-226.2002
Dubourg2013 2013

Dubourg G, Lagier JC, Armougom F, Robert C, Hamad I, Brouqui P, Raoult D.

The gut microbiota of a patient with resistant tuberculosis is more comprehensively studied by culturomics than by metagenomics. 10.1007/s10096-012-1787-3
Mangin2004 2004

Mangin I, Bonnet R, Seksik P, Rigottier-Gois L, Sutren M, Bouhnik Y, Neut C, Collins MD, Colombel JF, Marteau P, Doré J.

Molecular inventory of faecal microflora in patients with Crohn's disease. 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.05.005
Woodmansey2004 2004

Woodmansey EJ, McMurdo ME, Macfarlane GT, Macfarlane S.

Comparison of compositions and metabolic activities of fecal microbiotas in young adults and in antibiotic-treated and non-antibiotic-treated elderly subjects. 10.1128/AEM.70.10.6113-6122.2004
Frank2007 2007

Frank DN, St Amand AL, Feldman RA, Boedeker EC, Harpaz N, Pace NR.

Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. 10.1073/pnas.0706625104
deGoffau2013 2013

de Goffau MC, Luopajärvi K, Knip M, Ilonen J, Ruohtula T, Härkönen T, Orivuori L, Hakala S, Welling GW, Harmsen HJ, Vaarala O.

Fecal microbiota composition differs between children with β-cell autoimmunity and those without. 10.2337/db12-0526
Zupancic2012 2012

Margaret L. Zupancic, Brandi L. Cantarel, Zhenqiu Liu, Elliott F. Drabek, Kathleen A. Ryan, Shana Cirimotich, Cheron Jones, Rob Knight, William A. Walters, Daniel Knights, Emmanuel F. Mongodin, Richard B. Horenstein, Braxton D. Mitchell, Nanette Steinle, Soren Snitker, Alan R. Shuldiner, Claire M. Fraser

Analysis of the Gut Microbiota in the Old Order Amish and Its Relation to the Metabolic Syndrome. 10.1371/journal.pone.0043052
Nam2008a 2008

Nam YD, Chang HW, Kim KH, Roh SW, Kim MS, Jung MJ, Lee SW, Kim JY, Yoon JH, Bae JW.

Bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryal diversity in the intestines of Korean people. 10.1007/s12275-008-0199-7
MacFarlane2004 2004

Macfarlane S, Furrie E, Cummings JH, Macfarlane GT.

Chemotaxonomic analysis of bacterial populations colonizing the rectal mucosa in patients with ulcerative colitis. 10.1086/420823
Holdeman1976 1976

Holdeman LV, Good IJ, Moore WE.

Human fecal flora: variation in bacterial composition within individuals and a possible effect of emotional stress. 10.1128/aem.31.3.359-375.1976
Heilig2002 2002

Heilig HG, Zoetendal EG, Vaughan EE, Marteau P, Akkermans AD, de Vos WM.

Molecular diversity of Lactobacillus spp. and other lactic acid bacteria in the human intestine as determined by specific amplification of 16S ribosomal DNA. 10.1128/AEM.68.1.114-123.2002
DalBello2006 2006

Dal Bello F, Hertel C.

Oral cavity as natural reservoir for intestinal lactobacilli. 10.1016/j.syapm.2005.07.002
Bik2006 2006

Bik EM, Eckburg PB, Gill SR, Nelson KE, Purdom EA, Francois F, Perez-Perez G, Blaser MJ, Relman DA.

Molecular analysis of the bacterial microbiota in the human stomach. 10.1073/pnas.0506655103
Benno1984 1984

Benno Y, Sawada K, Mitsuoka T.

The intestinal microflora of infants: composition of fecal flora in breast-fed and bottle-fed infants. 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1984.tb00754.x
New2022 2022

Felicia N. New, Benjamin R. Baer, Andrew G. Clark, Martin T. Wells and Ilana L. Brito

Collective effects of human genomic variation on microbiome function. 10.1038/s41598-022-07632-3
Rossi2016 2016

Rossi M, Martínez-Martínez D, Amaretti A, Ulrici A, Raimondi S, Moya A.

Mining metagenomic whole genome sequences revealed subdominant but constant Lactobacillus population in the human gut microbiota. 10.1111/1758-2229.12405
Byrd2020 2020

Allyson L. Byrd, Menghan Liu, Kei E. Fujimura, Svetlana Lyalina, Deepti R. Nagarkar, Bruno Charbit, Jacob Bergstedt, Etienne Patin, Oliver J. Harrison, Lluís Quintana-Murci, Darragh Duffy, Matthew L. Albert and The Milieu Intérieur Consortium

Stability and dynamics of the human gut microbiome and its association with systemic immune traits. 10.1101/2020.01.17.909853
Cassir2015 2015

Cassir N, Benamar S, Khalil JB, Croce O, Saint-Faust M, Jacquot A, Million M, Azza S, Armstrong N, Henry M, Jardot P, Robert C, Gire C, Lagier JC, Chabrière E, Ghigo E, Marchandin H, Sartor C, Boutte P, Cambonie G, Simeoni U, Raoult D, La Scola B.

Clostridium butyricum Strains and Dysbiosis Linked to Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Neonates 10.1093/cid/civ468
Chen2020 2020

Chen J, Wang Q, Wang A, Lin Z.

Structural and Functional Characterization of the Gut Microbiota in Elderly Women With Migraine 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00470
Dubinkina2017 2017

Dubinkina VB, Tyakht AV, Odintsova VY, Yarygin KS, Kovarsky BA, Pavlenko AV, Ischenko DS, Popenko AS, Alexeev DG, Taraskina AY, Nasyrova RF, Krupitsky EM, Shalikiani NV, Bakulin IG, Shcherbakov PL, Skorodumova LO, Larin AK, Kostryukova ES, Abdulkhakov RA, Abdulkhakov SR, Malanin SY, Ismagilova RK, Grigoryeva TV, Ilina EN, Govorun VM.

Links of gut microbiota composition with alcohol dependence syndrome and alcoholic liver disease 10.1186/s40168-017-0359-2
Hu2019 2019

Hu Y, Feng Y, Wu J, Liu F, Zhang Z, Hao Y, Liang S, Li B, Li J, Lv N, Xu Y, Zhu B, Sun Z.

The Gut Microbiome Signatures Discriminate Healthy From Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00090
Jie2017 2017

Jie Z, Xia H, Zhong SL, Feng Q, Li S, Liang S, Zhong H, Liu Z, Gao Y, Zhao H, Zhang D, Su Z, Fang Z, Lan Z, Li J, Xiao L, Li J, Li R, Li X, Li F, Ren H, Huang Y, Peng Y, Li G, Wen B, Dong B, Chen JY, Geng QS, Zhang ZW, Yang H, Wang J, Wang J, Zhang X, Madsen L, Brix S, Ning G, Xu X, Liu X, Hou Y, Jia H, He K, Kristiansen K.

The gut microbiome in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease 10.1038/s41467-017-00900-1
Karlsson2013 2013

Karlsson FH, Tremaroli V, Nookaew I, Bergström G, Behre CJ, Fagerberg B, Nielsen J, Bäckhed F.

Gut metagenome in European women with normal, impaired and diabetic glucose control 10.1038/nature12198
LeChatelier2013 2013

Le Chatelier E, Nielsen T, Qin J, Prifti E, Hildebrand F, Falony G, Almeida M, Arumugam M, Batto JM, Kennedy S, Leonard P, Li J, Burgdorf K, Grarup N, Jørgensen T, Brandslund I, Nielsen HB, Juncker AS, Bertalan M, Levenez F, Pons N, Rasmussen S, Sunagawa S, Tap J, Tims S, Zoetendal EG, Brunak S, Clément K, Doré J, Kleerebezem M, Kristiansen K, Renault P, Sicheritz-Ponten T, de Vos WM, Zucker JD, Raes J, Hansen T; MetaHIT consortium, Bork P, Wang J, Ehrlich SD, Pedersen O.

Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers 10.1038/nature12506
Li2019b 2019

Li Y, Wang HF, Li X, Li HX, Zhang Q, Zhou HW, He Y, Li P, Fu C, Zhang XH, Qiu YR, Li JL.

Disordered intestinal microbes are associated with the activity of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus 10.1042/CS20180841
Minerbi2019 2019

Minerbi A, Gonzalez E, Brereton NJB, Anjarkouchian A, Dewar K, Fitzcharles MA, Chevalier S, Shir Y.

Altered microbiome composition in individuals with fibromyalgia 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001640
Moore1995 1995

Moore WE, Moore LH.

Intestinal floras of populations that have a high risk of colon cancer 10.1128/aem.61.9.3202-3207.1995
PerezBrocal2015 2015

Pérez-Brocal V, García-López R, Nos P, Beltrán B, Moret I, Moya A.

Metagenomic Analysis of Crohn's Disease Patients Identifies Changes in the Virome and Microbiome Related to Disease Status and Therapy, and Detects Potential Interactions and Biomarkers 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000549
Qin2012 2012

Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J, Zhang F, Liang S, Zhang W, Guan Y, Shen D, Peng Y, Zhang D, Jie Z, Wu W, Qin Y, Xue W, Li J, Han L, Lu D, Wu P, Dai Y, Sun X, Li Z, Tang A, Zhong S, Li X, Chen W, Xu R, Wang M, Feng Q, Gong M, Yu J, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Hansen T, Sanchez G, Raes J, Falony G, Okuda S, Almeida M, LeChatelier E, Renault P, Pons N, Batto JM, Zhang Z, Chen H, Yang R, Zheng W, Li S, Yang H, Wang J, Ehrlich SD, Nielsen R, Pedersen O, Kristiansen K, Wang J. A

Metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes 10.1038/nature11450
Urban2020 2020

Urban RJ, Pyles RB, Stewart CJ, Ajami N, Randolph KM, Durham WJ, Danesi CP, Dillon EL, Summons JR, Singh CK, Morrison M, Kreber LA, Masel B, Miller AL, Wright TJ, Sheffield-Moore M.

Altered Fecal Microbiome Years after Traumatic Brain Injury 10.1089/neu.2019.6688
Wang2018 2018

Wang Q, Li F, Liang B, Liang Y, Chen S, Mo X, Ju Y, Zhao H, Jia H, Spector TD, Xie H, Guo R.

A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in asthma in UK adults 10.1186/s12866-018-1257-x Free PMC Article
Wang2020a 2020

Wang X, Yang S, Li S, Zhao L, Hao Y, Qin J, Zhang L, Zhang C, Bian W, Zuo L, Gao X, Zhu B, Lei XG, Gu Z, Cui W, Xu X, Li Z, Zhu B, Li Y, Chen S, Guo H, Zhang H, Sun J, Zhang M, Hui Y, Zhang X, Liu X, Sun B, Wang L, Qiu Q, Zhang Y, Li X, Liu W, Xue R, Wu H, Shao D, Li J, Zhou Y, Li S, Yang R, Pedersen OB, Yu Z, Ehrlich SD, Ren F.

Aberrant gut microbiota alters host metabolome and impacts renal failure in humans and rodents 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319766
Yachida2019 2019

Yachida S, Mizutani S, Shiroma H, Shiba S, Nakajima T, Sakamoto T, Watanabe H, Masuda K, Nishimoto Y, Kubo M, Hosoda F, Rokutan H, Matsumoto M, Takamaru H, Yamada M, Matsuda T, Iwasaki M, Yamaji T, Yachida T, Soga T, Kurokawa K, Toyoda A, Ogura Y, Hayashi T, Hatakeyama M, Nakagama H, Saito Y, Fukuda S, Shibata T, Yamada T.

Metagenomic and metabolomic analyses reveal distinct stage-specific phenotypes of the gut microbiota in colorectal cancer 10.1038/s41591-019-0458-7
Zeller2014 2014

Zeller G, Tap J, Voigt AY, Sunagawa S, Kultima JR, Costea PI, Amiot A, Böhm J, Brunetti F, Habermann N, Hercog R, Koch M, Luciani A, Mende DR, Schneider MA, Schrotz-King P, Tournigand C, Tran Van Nhieu J, Yamada T, Zimmermann J, Benes V, Kloor M, Ulrich CM, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Sobhani I, Bork P.

Potential of fecal microbiota for early-stage detection of colorectal cancer 10.15252/msb.20145645
Jeong2021 2021

Jeong J, Yun K, Mun S, Chung WH, Choi SY, Nam YD, Lim MY, Hong CP, Park C, Ahn YJ, Han K.

The effect of taxonomic classification by full-length 16S rRNA sequencing with a synthetic long-read technology 10.1038/s41598-020-80826-9
Singh2022 2022

Singh R, Dutta A, Bose T, Mande SS.

A compendium of predicted growths and derived symbiotic relationships between 803 gut microbes in 13 different diets. 10.1016/j.crmicr.2022.100127

Exceptions

Table 3: The 'lived experience' data that doesn't correlate with that of the surveys. The table is sortable.

Species Survey Count Status Justification for Change
Actinomyces viscosus 5 Minor Coloniser In 17% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Agathobaculum desmolans 5 Minor Coloniser In 39% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Alloscardovia omnicolens 6 Minor Coloniser In 32% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Anaeroglobus geminatus 5 Minor Coloniser In 18% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Bacteroides neonati 4 Minor Coloniser In 63% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Bacteroides pyogenes 6 Minor Coloniser In 58% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). A minor coloniser.
Bariatricus massiliensis 2 Minor Coloniser In 41% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Bifidobacterium ruminantium 2 Minor Coloniser In 70% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Bifidobacterium scardovii 4 Minor Coloniser In 27% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Butyricimonas synergistica 5 Minor Coloniser In 54% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). A minor coloniser.
Christensenella hongkongensis 6 Minor Coloniser In 27% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Christensenella minuta 5 Minor Coloniser In 52% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). A minor coloniser.
Christensenella timonensis 2 Minor Coloniser In 15% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Citrobacter farmeri 3 Minor Coloniser In 14% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Citrobacter freundii 19 Minor Coloniser In 6% of Europeans (unseenbio.com), i.e., a minor coloniser.
Clostridium saudiense 4 Minor Coloniser In 54% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Collinsella bouchesdurhonensis 3 Minor Coloniser In 26% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Dielma fastidiosa 6 Minor Coloniser In 44% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Duodenibacillus massiliensis 3 Minor Coloniser In 25% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Emergencia timonensis 2 Minor Coloniser In 44% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Enterocloster lavalensis 5 Minor Coloniser In 68% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Eubacterium callanderi 4 Minor Coloniser In 30% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Eubacterium coprostanoligenes 4 Minor Coloniser In 38% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Faecalicatena fissicatena 2 Minor Coloniser In 50% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Faecalicatena glycyrrhizinilyticum 2 Minor Coloniser Isolation and characterisation not yet published. In 69% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). A minor coloniser.
Faecalicoccus pleomorphus 5 Minor Coloniser In 13% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Gordonibacter urolithinfaciens 4 Minor Coloniser In 28% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Haemophilus parahaemolyticus 3 Minor Coloniser In 17% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Haemophilus sputorum 6 Minor Coloniser In 11% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Hungatella effluvii 3 Minor Coloniser In 65% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Klebsiella grimontii 2 Minor Coloniser In 11% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Klebsiella michiganensis 4 Minor Coloniser In 12% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Klebsiella quasipneumoniae subsp. quasipneumoniae 2 Minor Coloniser In 10% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Kluyvera ascorbata 6 Minor Coloniser Kluyvera ascorbata in 8% of Europeans, Kluyvera ascorbata_B also with 8% (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Kosakonia cowanii 2 Minor Coloniser In 10% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Lachnoclostridium edouardi 2 Minor Coloniser In 59% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Lachnoclostridium phytofermentans 5 Minor Coloniser In 14% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Lacticaseibacillus paracasei 15 Minor Coloniser In 17% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Produces GABA (Sahad2020).
Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. delbrueckii 16 Minor Coloniser In 12% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Lactobacillus kalixensis 3 Minor Coloniser In 24% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Lactococcus raffinolactis 5 Minor Coloniser In 13% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Lactonifactor longoviformis 6 Minor Coloniser In 56% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Lancefieldella rimae 5 Minor Coloniser In 11% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Mitsuokella jalaludinii 6 Minor Coloniser In 16% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Monoglobus pectinilyticus 4 Minor Coloniser In 34% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Muribaculum intestinale 2 Minor Coloniser In 31% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Negativibacillus massiliensis 2 Minor Coloniser In 53% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Phocaeicola salanitronis 6 Minor Coloniser In 34% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Phocea massiliensis 3 Minor Coloniser In 61% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Prevotella multisaccharivorax 5 Minor Coloniser In 14% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Prevotellamassilia timonensis 4 Minor Coloniser In 50% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Ruminococcus gauvreauii 6 Minor Coloniser In 19% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Scardovia wiggsiae 3 Minor Coloniser In 15% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Sellimonas intestinalis 4 Minor Coloniser In 44% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Stomatobaculum longum 4 Minor Coloniser In 27% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Streptococcus infantarius subsp. infantarius 3 Minor Coloniser In 15% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Streptococcus timonensis 2 Minor Coloniser In 16% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Thermophilibacter provencensis 2 Minor Coloniser In 19% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Veillonella rogosae 2 Minor Coloniser In 43% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Weissella viridescens 3 Minor Coloniser In 48% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Minor coloniser.
Absiella innocuum 1 Moderate Coloniser In 94% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Agathobaculum butyriciproducens 3 Moderate Coloniser In 99% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Alistipes ihumii 4 Moderate Coloniser In 92% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Alistipes obesi 5 Moderate Coloniser In 97% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Alistipes senegalensis 9 Moderate Coloniser In 97% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Alistipes timonensis 5 Moderate Coloniser In 89% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Anaerotignum lactatifermentans 8 Moderate Coloniser In 95% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Anaerotruncus rubiinfantis 3 Moderate Coloniser In 75% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Bacteroides acidifaciens 5 Moderate Coloniser In 100% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Bacteroides bouchesdurhonensis 2 Moderate Coloniser In 96% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Reported attributes are confusing and have been added to a limited extent.
Bacteroides congonensis 3 Moderate Coloniser High salt required for optimum growth. In 99% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Bacteroides cutis 1 Moderate Coloniser In 76% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Bacteroides faecis 13 Moderate Coloniser In 100% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Bacteroides fluxus 11 Moderate Coloniser In 95% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Bacteroides gallinarum 4 Moderate Coloniser In 88% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Bacteroides mediterraneensis 2 Moderate Coloniser In 87% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Bacteroides oleiciplenus 9 Moderate Coloniser In 97% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Bacteroides stercorirosoris 4 Moderate Coloniser In 98% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis 14 Moderate Coloniser In 83% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Bittarella massiliensis 2 Moderate Coloniser In 90% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Blautia massiliensis 5 Moderate Coloniser In 100% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Blautia wexlerae 13 Moderate Coloniser In 100% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Butyricimonas virosa 9 Moderate Coloniser In 81% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Clostridium methylpentosum 11 Moderate Coloniser Seen in 83% of subjects in study by Qin2010, but at low levels. Moderate coloniser.
Coprobacter fastidiosus 10 Moderate Coloniser In 87% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Coprobacter secundus 2 Moderate Coloniser In 73% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Dysosmobacter welbionis 1 Moderate Coloniser Recently discovered but reported to be widespread ("up to 70% of the population").
Eisenbergiella massiliensis 3 Moderate Coloniser In 74% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Eisenbergiella tayi 5 Moderate Coloniser In 97% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Enterocloster asparagiformis 13 Moderate Coloniser In 51% of Europeans (unseenbio.com), but in 95% of subjects in study by Qin2010. Moderate coloniser.
Enterococcus devriesei 2 Moderate Coloniser In 79% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Faecalicatena faecis 1 Moderate Coloniser Isolation and characterisation not yet published. In 99% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). A moderate coloniser.
Faecalicatena gnavus 1 Moderate Coloniser Isolation and characterisation not yet published. In 85% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). A moderate coloniser.
Faecalicatena lactaris 1 Moderate Coloniser Isolation and characterisation not yet published. In 98% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). A moderate coloniser.
Faecalicatena torques 1 Moderate Coloniser Isolation and characterisation not yet published. In 97% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). A moderate coloniser.
Fournierella massiliensis 2 Moderate Coloniser In 90% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans 9 Moderate Coloniser In 100% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Gemmiger formicilis 8 Moderate Coloniser In 97% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Gemmiger variabile 1 Moderate Coloniser No record in the NCBI database for this organism. In 77% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). A moderate coloniser.
Intestinimonas butyriciproducens 11 Moderate Coloniser In 94% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Intestinimonas massiliensis 3 Moderate Coloniser In 94% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Lachnospira rogosae 1 Moderate Coloniser No record in the NCBI database for this organism. In 99% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). A moderate coloniser.
Lacrimispora saccharolytica 9 Moderate Coloniser In 99% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Lawsonibacter asaccharolyticus 1 Moderate Coloniser In 97% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Massilimicrobiota timonensis 2 Moderate Coloniser In 98% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Massilioclostridium coli 2 Moderate Coloniser In 98% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Parabacteroides goldsteinii 14 Moderate Coloniser In 69% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Paraprevotella clara 11 Moderate Coloniser In 91% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Phocaeicola barnesiae 7 Moderate Coloniser In 79% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Phocaeicola sartorii 4 Moderate Coloniser In 99% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Prevotella bergensis 5 Moderate Coloniser In 86% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Prevotella corporis 6 Moderate Coloniser In 99% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Prevotella melaninogenica 13 Moderate Coloniser In 86% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Prevotella oris 8 Moderate Coloniser In 94% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Provencibacterium massiliense 1 Moderate Coloniser In 75% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Romboutsia timonensis 2 Moderate Coloniser In 78% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Ruminococcus bicirculans 10 Moderate Coloniser In 94% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Ruminococcus champanellensis 13 Moderate Coloniser In 72% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Ruthenibacterium lactatiformans 5 Moderate Coloniser In 99% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Tidjanibacter inops 1 Moderate Coloniser Isolation and characterisation not yet published. In 83% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). A moderate coloniser.
Phocaeicola coprocola 22 Widespread Coloniser In 95% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Phocaeicola coprophilus 21 Widespread Coloniser In 87% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Roseburia faecis 16 Widespread Coloniser In 99% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Acinetobacter johnsonii 8 Rare Coloniser Obligate aerobe and grows poorly at 37C, but has been found in the faeces of non-hospitalised patients from Leiden (Dijkshoorn2005). Not detected in Europeans with a healthy microbiome (unseenbio.com).
Acinetobacter junii 10 Rare Coloniser In 1% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Rare coloniser.
Enterococcus gallinarum 12 Rare Coloniser In 1% of Europeans (unseenbio.com).
Fusobacterium ulcerans 13 Rare Coloniser Few Europeans have it (unseenbio.com).
Lacticaseibacillus casei 13 Rare Coloniser An unlikely permanent inhabitant of the colon. Found in human breast milk (Jeurink2013).
Lactobacillus helveticus 11 Rare Coloniser A probiotic, but only present in the faeces of 3% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Found in human breast milk (Jeurink2013).
Lactobacillus iners 11 Rare Coloniser Rare coloniser.
Limosilactobacillus mucosae 13 Rare Coloniser In 4% of Europeans (unseenbio.com), i.e., a rare coloniser.
Limosilactobacillus vaginalis 13 Rare Coloniser In 3% of Europeans, so a rare coloniser. Found in human breast milk (Jeurink2013).
Neisseria subflava 12 Rare Coloniser In 6% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Rare coloniser.
Pediococcus acidilactici 10 Rare Coloniser In 1% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Rare coloniser. A probiotic.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 15 Rare Coloniser In 7% of Europeans (unseenbio.com). Rare coloniser.